Versa's Sovereign SASE-as-a-Service keeps your traffic inside EU infrastructure operated by a Versa subsidiary. ALLOD removes the vendor from the equation entirely - the infrastructure is yours, operated by your own team.
| Dimension | ALLOD | Versa Sovereign SASE |
|---|---|---|
| Operating model | Self-hosted - you deploy and operate it on your own infrastructure | Managed service - Versa operates the sovereign PoP for you |
| Infrastructure owner | Your organisation | Versa Networks B.V. (EU subsidiary of Versa Networks Inc.) |
| Vendor access to traffic | None - no vendor infrastructure is in the path | Versa's EU entity operates the plane that processes your traffic |
| Parent company jurisdiction | Allod Solutions AB - Swedish company, no foreign parent | Versa Networks Inc. - US-headquartered parent |
| Feature scope | Firewall, DLP, CASB, ZTNA | SD-WAN, ZTNA, firewall, secure web protection, threat prevention, data protection |
| Operational burden | Your team runs it - full control, full responsibility | Vendor-run - lower operational burden, less direct control |
An EU subsidiary running your traffic is a contractual sovereignty guarantee. Infrastructure you operate yourself is a structural one. Both are legitimate answers - to different risk tolerances.
A Dutch subsidiary's data processing terms narrow legal exposure, but the parent company remains US-incorporated. Whether that fully insulates a given deployment from US legal reach is a question for your counsel, not marketing copy - on either side.
If you don't want to operate security infrastructure at all, a vendor-run EU PoP removes that burden entirely. That's a legitimate trade if your compliance requirement is satisfied by contractual and jurisdictional guarantees rather than architectural elimination of the vendor.
ALLOD's architecture means there is no vendor infrastructure processing your traffic to begin with - EU-incorporated or otherwise. For regulated entities where "no third party has technical access" is the actual bar, that's a structural answer rather than a contractual one.
No. It's a fully managed offering - Versa operates the sovereign point of presence for you through Versa Networks B.V. ALLOD is deployed and operated on infrastructure your own organisation controls.
It narrows exposure, but the parent, Versa Networks Inc., is US-headquartered. Whether that structure fully removes CLOUD Act or FISA 702 reach is worth raising with counsel. Architectures with no vendor in the path at all remove the question rather than relying on corporate structure to answer it.
A full SASE stack - SD-WAN, ZTNA, firewall, secure web protection, threat prevention and data protection - with data, control and management planes kept within EU infrastructure.
If you don't want to operate infrastructure at all and a contractual EU-jurisdiction guarantee satisfies your requirement, a managed offering reduces operational burden. If "no vendor has technical access" is the actual bar, self-hosting is the only architecture that satisfies it structurally.
Book a 30-minute demo - we'll walk through deployment on your own infrastructure, start to finish.