ALLOD vs Netskope

Deep SaaS visibility. In whose cloud.

Netskope's Cloud XD engine inspects SaaS activity from its own NewEdge network. ALLOD applies CASB tagging and DLP inline, on infrastructure you own, with no vendor cloud in the path.

At a glance

Cloud-proxy CASB vs self-hosted CASB, side by side.

DimensionALLODNetskope
Where inspection happensInline, on your own infrastructureRouted through Netskope's NewEdge cloud network
Vendor access to trafficNone - no vendor infrastructure in the pathNetskope's cloud processes activity across your SaaS traffic
Vendor jurisdictionAllod Solutions AB, SwedenNetskope, Inc., US-incorporated, subject to CLOUD Act or FISA 702
SaaS app coverage breadthCategory/domain/app-based classification, growing app catalogueCloud XD engine - activity-level visibility across 3,000+ pre-integrated apps
Feature scopeFirewall, DLP, CASB, ZTNAFull SSE suite - CASB, SWG, ZTNA, DLP, SD-WAN via Netskope One
DLP channel coverageOne rule engine across HTTP uploads, email, USB, print (blocked before paper), SSH/SCP/rsync/git, and clipboard - including a live check inside certificate-pinned apps the proxy can't decryptPrimarily SaaS-API and web traffic via Cloud XD; USB, print and endpoint-level DLP typically require a separate agent or add-on SKU
Operational modelYou deploy and run itFully managed cloud service
The honest distinction

Netskope's app-by-app depth took years and a large engineering team to build. That same traffic still passes through a US-incorporated vendor's cloud to get that depth.

Netskope's app-level depth is real

Cloud XD's activity-level visibility across thousands of pre-integrated SaaS apps is a genuine engineering advantage for organisations whose priority is granular control over specific, high-risk applications.

But it runs through a US-incorporated vendor's cloud

Netskope, Inc. can be legally compelled under the CLOUD Act or FISA 702 to disclose data it processes, regardless of where the physical infrastructure sits. That's a property of the corporate structure behind the platform.

ALLOD trades some app-level depth for zero vendor exposure

ALLOD's CASB classification runs on your own infrastructure. The catalogue of pre-integrated apps is smaller than Netskope's, but nothing you send is ever visible to Allod Solutions or routed through infrastructure we operate.

Questions people ask

ALLOD vs Netskope, in plain terms.

Where does Netskope inspect traffic?

Through its NewEdge network, a cloud infrastructure Netskope operates, where its Cloud XD engine inspects SaaS activity before forwarding traffic on.

Where does ALLOD inspect traffic?

Inline, on infrastructure the customer owns and operates. CASB tagging and DLP inspection happen on that same infrastructure - no vendor cloud in the path.

Is Netskope subject to the CLOUD Act or FISA 702?

Netskope, Inc. is US-incorporated and can be legally compelled under the CLOUD Act or FISA 702 to disclose data it processes, regardless of where its infrastructure physically sits.

Why would an organisation still choose Netskope?

Its Cloud XD engine offers very deep, activity-level visibility across 3,000+ SaaS apps - a breadth of pre-built coverage that's hard for a smaller or self-hosted vendor to match one for one. If maximum SaaS app coverage matters more than sovereignty guarantees, that's a real advantage.

Does ALLOD's DLP cover as much as Netskope's?

Depends what you mean by coverage. ALLOD reaches channels a SaaS-API-centric platform typically doesn't see directly - USB, print (blocked before paper), SSH/SCP/rsync/git, and certificate-pinned apps. It doesn't yet match Netskope's 3,000+ pre-integrated app connectors or its pre-built classifier library.

Get started

See CASB and DLP running on your own infrastructure.

Book a 30-minute demo - we'll walk through SaaS traffic classification on your own environment.